PBSMX vs. DFAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX).
PBSMX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 1, 1989. DFAIX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 5, 2013.
Performance
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBSMX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | -0.49% | 6.41% | 4.25% | 5.98% | -7.06% | -0.71% | 5.16% | 6.47% | 0.35% | 1.86% |
DFAIX DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio | 0.86% | 4.86% | 6.38% | 5.64% | -2.77% | 5.40% | 2.75% | 5.63% | 0.11% | 1.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBSMX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than DFAIX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PBSMX has underperformed DFAIX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while DFAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.20% annualized return.
PBSMX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
DFAIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBSMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAIX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBSMX vs. DFAIX — Risk / Return Rank
PBSMX
DFAIX
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBSMX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 3.57 | -1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 5.96 | -2.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.07 | -0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 8.64 | -5.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 34.01 | -23.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBSMX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 3.57 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 1.21 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 1.26 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBSMX and DFAIX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Dividend Comparison
PBSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than DFAIX's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBSMX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 3.51% | 3.74% | 3.00% | 2.65% | 2.02% | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.57% | 2.57% | 2.40% | 2.40% | 2.56% |
DFAIX DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio | 4.61% | 4.65% | 4.14% | 3.66% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.82% | 2.53% | 2.72% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBSMX drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, which is greater than DFAIX's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSMX and DFAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBSMX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -5.63% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.65% | -0.47% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.70% | -5.46% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.70% | -5.63% | -5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.28% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -0.95% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.12% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PBSMX vs. DFAIX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (PBSMX) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that PBSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBSMX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 0.50% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 0.75% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 1.07% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.86% | 3.18% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.62% | 2.56% | +0.06% |