PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSIX vs. JGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSIX achieves a 30.70% return, which is significantly higher than JGMNX's 11.51% return.


PBSIX

1D
-1.08%
1M
1.72%
YTD
30.70%
6M
23.41%
1Y
55.95%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

JGMNX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.06%
YTD
11.51%
6M
10.31%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
30.70%12.05%3.75%21.83%-42.90%16.44%50.02%21.22%1.96%1.42%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
11.51%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSIX and JGMNX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

0.87

The correlation between PBSIX and JGMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBSIX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSIX
PBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBSIXJGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

2.33

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.44

9.62

+5.83

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the JGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSIX and JGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBSIXJGMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.60

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.22

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.59

-0.21

Drawdowns

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSIX and JGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSIXJGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.49%

-39.72%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-11.03%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-23.84%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

-31.74%

-20.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-0.98%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-7.13%

-14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

2.67%

+1.10%

Volatility

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison

Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) at 5.21%. This indicates that PBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBSIXJGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

5.21%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

12.37%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.10%

16.08%

+13.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

19.59%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

20.58%

+6.98%

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBSIX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison

PBSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JGMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.74%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.60%0.11%0.48%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBSIX and JGMNX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBSIX has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to JGMNX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSIX dropped -52.49% vs JGMNX's -39.72%.

PBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBSIX and JGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer