PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBSIX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
-3.41%12.05%3.75%10.18%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
-4.71%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSIX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's -4.71% return.


PBSIX

1D
-3.92%
1M
-10.12%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-5.22%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
-1.94%
10Y*

CMCIX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-8.88%
YTD
-4.71%
6M
-7.29%
1Y
-5.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBSIX and CMCIX have an expense ratio of 1.26%.


Return for Risk

PBSIX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSIX
PBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBSIXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

-0.29

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

-0.30

+1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.96

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.54

+1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.81

-1.39

+6.20

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSIX and CMCIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBSIXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

-0.29

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.18

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between PBSIX and CMCIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

PBSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PBSIX
Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.60%0.11%0.48%0.16%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.46%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSIX and CMCIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBSIXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.49%

-21.50%

-30.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-12.55%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.09%

-16.43%

-13.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-6.16%

-15.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

4.90%

-0.26%

Volatility

PBSIX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 4.68%. This indicates that PBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBSIXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

4.68%

+6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.38%

10.54%

+10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.18%

19.19%

+11.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.27%

16.61%

+11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.37%

16.61%

+10.76%