PBQQ vs. NAPR
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds — PBQQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. PBQQ is actively managed, while NAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 24.38% for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.
Performance
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 7.05% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAPR
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.05% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and NAPR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PBQQ and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
NAPR
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 4.84 | -1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 9.39 | -4.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 2.40 | -0.67 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 16.87 | -11.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 85.83 | -59.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 4.84 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.03 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and NAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -16.53% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -1.24% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.32% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.26% | +0.73% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.85%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | NAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 1.85% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 2.85% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 5.09% | +3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 11.31% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 10.70% | +1.65% |
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |