PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBQQ vs. NAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 7.05% return.


PBQQ

1D
0.57%
1M
5.21%
YTD
4.74%
6M
7.46%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NAPR

1D
0.35%
1M
5.61%
YTD
7.05%
6M
9.12%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBQQ and NAPR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.89

The correlation between PBQQ and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBQQ vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBQQ
PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBQQNAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.46

4.84

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.32

9.39

-4.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

2.40

-0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.53

16.87

-11.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.21

85.83

-59.62

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is comparable to the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQQ and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBQQNAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46

4.84

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

1.03

+0.27

Drawdowns

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and NAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBQQNAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-16.53%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-1.24%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-2.32%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.26%

+0.73%

Volatility

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 1.85%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBQQNAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

1.85%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

2.85%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.22%

5.09%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

11.31%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.35%

10.70%

+1.65%

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBQQ vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.