PBQQ vs. KAPR
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and KAPR (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBQQ is actively managed, while KAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 28.73% for KAPR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KAPR.
Performance
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 8.94% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KAPR
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 8.94% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and KAPR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PBQQ and KAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
KAPR
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 4.12 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 6.67 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.92 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 11.28 | -5.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 52.81 | -26.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 4.12 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.81 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and KAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -16.91% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -2.52% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -3.99% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.54% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) at 2.15%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | KAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 2.15% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 4.24% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 7.04% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 11.80% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 11.70% | +0.65% |
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while KAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
KAPR Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |