PBQQ vs. EAPR
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBQQ is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 25.42% for EAPR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.
Performance
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 9.19% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 9.19% | 15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and EAPR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PBQQ and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
EAPR
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 4.10 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 8.39 | -3.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 2.27 | -0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 17.73 | -12.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 72.60 | -46.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 4.10 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.52 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and EAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -17.65% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -1.42% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -4.15% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.35% | +0.64% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) is 3.56%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that PBQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.18% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 4.63% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 6.27% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 9.97% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 9.95% | +2.40% |
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |