PBPNX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PBPNX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund | -0.85% | 15.13% | 7.96% | 14.66% | -17.47% | 12.97% | 14.28% | 21.31% | -6.26% | 17.05% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -1.93% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPNX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PBPNX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.80% annualized return.
PBPNX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.92%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPNX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBPNX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PBPNX
PFORX
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBPNX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.61 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 0.86 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 0.66 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 2.97 | +4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBPNX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.61 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.33 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.91 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.25 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPNX and PFORX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PBPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than PFORX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund | 4.00% | 4.05% | 4.02% | 3.30% | 3.84% | 5.10% | 3.21% | 3.81% | 4.68% | 2.14% | 3.11% | 2.62% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.86% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPNX drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPNX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPNX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.09% | -13.87% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.00% | -3.99% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.90% | -13.71% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.09% | -13.87% | -10.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -3.39% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -1.95% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.89% | +0.79% |
Volatility
PBPNX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.99%. This indicates that PBPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBPNX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 1.99% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.73% | 2.55% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.38% | 3.39% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.14% | 3.47% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 3.08% | +7.50% |