PBPH vs. XBI
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and XBI (SPDR S&P Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while XBI tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XBI.
Performance
PBPH vs. XBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 6.48% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBI
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 58.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
PBPH vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.13% | 0.76% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 6.48% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and XBI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
XBI
PBPH vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBPH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.36 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and XBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -63.89% | +52.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -24.96% | +16.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -20.93% | +16.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | XBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 25.50% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 32.18% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 32.00% | -15.22% |
PBPH vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBPH vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than XBI's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBI SPDR S&P Biotech ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and XBI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XBI.
XBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.35% for XBI.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and XBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer