PBPH vs. PSCH
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and PSCH (Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while PSCH tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCH.
Performance
PBPH vs. PSCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than PSCH's 1.80% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCH
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
PBPH vs. PSCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.13% | 0.76% |
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 1.80% | -3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and PSCH is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. PSCH — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
PSCH
PBPH vs. PSCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF (PSCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBPH | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.51 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. PSCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum PSCH drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and PSCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -46.32% | +35.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.69% | -30.59% | +21.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -13.46% | +9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.54% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. PSCH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | PSCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 20.26% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 22.89% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 23.63% | -6.85% |
PBPH vs. PSCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCH's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBPH vs. PSCH - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, more than PSCH's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCH Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.27% | 0.01% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and PSCH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCH.
PBPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.01% for PSCH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while PSCH tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.29% for PSCH.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and PSCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer