PBOT vs. ARTY
PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) and ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. PBOT is actively managed, while ARTY is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ARTY.
Performance
PBOT vs. ARTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOT achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly lower than ARTY's 43.65% return.
PBOT
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 19.50%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARTY
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- 33.87%
- YTD
- 43.65%
- 1Y
- 62.28%
- 3Y*
- 26.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $34.73M | $43.64M | $60.98M | |
| $23.32K | $22.92K | $19.40K |
PBOT vs. ARTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 22.92% | 0.33% |
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 43.65% | -1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOT and ARTY is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOT vs. ARTY — Risk / Return Rank
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARTY
PBOT vs. ARTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOT | ARTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOT vs. ARTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOT drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum ARTY drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOT and ARTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOT | ARTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -54.50% | +38.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -14.29% | +5.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -19.68% | +15.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.82% | — |
Volatility
PBOT vs. ARTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOT | ARTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.94% | 35.89% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 29.97% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 28.44% | -1.50% |
PBOT vs. ARTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ARTY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOT vs. ARTY - Dividend Comparison
PBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, more than ARTY's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBOT and ARTY have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.
PBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.06% for ARTY.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PBOT and 0.47% for ARTY.
Find the right allocation for PBOT and ARTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer