PBOG vs. OILT
PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) and OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index while OILT tracks the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOG charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for OILT.
Performance
PBOG vs. OILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 20.33% return, which is significantly lower than OILT's 23.87% return.
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 25.26%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG vs. OILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 23.87% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOG and OILT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOG vs. OILT — Risk / Return Rank
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILT
PBOG vs. OILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOG | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOG vs. OILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, smaller than the maximum OILT drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and OILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOG | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -35.21% | +18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -16.41% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -12.93% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility
PBOG vs. OILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOG | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 28.27% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 28.76% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 28.76% | -4.81% |
PBOG vs. OILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than OILT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOG vs. OILT - Dividend Comparison
PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than OILT's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.66% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PBOG and OILT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for OILT.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while OILT tracks Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.35% for OILT.
Find the right allocation for PBOG and OILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer