PBMR vs. FAAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PBMR (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBMR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBMR returned 12.02% vs 28.33% for FAAR. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBMR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.

Performance

PBMR vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBMR achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.

PBMR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 4.60%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FAAR

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -5.21%
• YTD: 19.14%
• 6M: 18.06%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 10.57%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 4.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBMR vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBMR PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March	4.60%	10.89%	9.62%
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	19.14%	8.07%	2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PBMR and FAAR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024	0.01

Return for Risk

PBMR vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBMR

PBMR Risk / Return Rank: 89
PBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FAAR

FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 75
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBMR vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBMR	FAAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.15	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.16	3.09	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.37	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	4.52	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.81	15.18	+5.63

PBMR vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBMR and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBMR vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBMR drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBMR and FAAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBMR	FAAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-18.03%	+10.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.33%	-6.29%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-6.29%	+5.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-7.82%	+7.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	1.87%	-1.29%

Volatility

PBMR vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March (PBMR) is 1.41%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that PBMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBMR	FAAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	2.55%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.62%	9.68%	-6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39%	13.38%	-8.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.58%	12.96%	-6.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.58%	11.54%	-4.96%

PBMR vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBMR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBMR vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PBMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF	9.66%	11.63%	3.45%	3.20%	5.82%	6.49%	3.05%	1.02%	0.58%	2.83%
PBMR PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBMR and FAAR in my portfolio?

PBMR and FAAR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBMR or FAAR?

FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to PBMR (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBMR dropped -7.64% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

Which ETF is better, PBMR or FAAR?

On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 28.33% vs 12.02% for PBMR. On fees, PBMR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PBMR has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBMR or FAAR?

Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 12.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBMR or FAAR?

PBMR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBMR or FAAR?

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.00% for PBMR.

What is the main difference between PBMR and FAAR?

PBMR is categorized as Options Trading, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBMR and 0.95% for FAAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.