PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBMPX vs. PLGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBMPX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than PLGIX's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PBMPX has underperformed PLGIX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while PLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


PBMPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.07%
1Y
5.41%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
1.67%

PLGIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
6.85%
YTD
6.11%
6M
5.10%
1Y
15.54%
3Y*
35.60%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBMPX
Principal Core Plus Bond Fund
0.19%7.15%0.71%5.23%-14.62%-0.84%9.33%9.64%-1.93%4.66%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
6.11%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PBMPX and PLGIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2000

-0.10

The correlation between PBMPX and PLGIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBMPX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBMPX
PBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBMPXPLGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.88

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

2.73

+2.89

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PLGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBMPX and PLGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBMPXPLGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.06

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.60

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.80

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBMPX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum PLGIX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBMPX and PLGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBMPXPLGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-55.43%

+35.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-18.32%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

-21.39%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

-40.63%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.48%

-40.63%

+21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-0.29%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-13.26%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

5.90%

-4.94%

Volatility

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Core Plus Bond Fund (PBMPX) is 1.48%, while Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that PBMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBMPXPLGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

3.61%

-2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

12.06%

-9.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

15.25%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

30.12%

-24.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

25.44%

-20.62%

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBMPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBMPX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison

PBMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than PLGIX's 13.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBMPX
Principal Core Plus Bond Fund
4.20%4.42%4.10%3.04%2.06%3.12%7.16%3.44%3.36%2.78%2.30%2.21%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
13.62%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBMPX and PLGIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGIX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to PBMPX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBMPX dropped -19.69% vs PLGIX's -55.43%.

PBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBMPX and PLGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer