PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBL vs. INCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBL vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBL achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than INCM's 6.45% return.


PBL

1D
-0.21%
1M
4.07%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.56%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10Y*

INCM

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.70%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.84%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBL vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PBL
PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF
7.85%12.35%16.70%7.66%
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
6.45%13.07%6.80%5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PBL and INCM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023

0.63

The correlation between PBL and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBL vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBL
PBL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

INCM
INCM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBL vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBLINCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.57

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.95

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

20.86

-7.30

PBL vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBL Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBL and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBLINCMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

3.01

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Drawdowns

PBL vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBL drawdown since its inception was -11.69%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBL and INCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBLINCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-7.84%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-3.19%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.75%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-1.09%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.44%

0.76%

+0.68%

Volatility

PBL vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF (PBL) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 1.66%. This indicates that PBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBLINCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

1.66%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

3.82%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.87%

5.25%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.83%

7.23%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

7.23%

+2.60%

PBL vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBL vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

PBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than INCM's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
INCM
Franklin Income Focus ETF
5.08%4.96%5.06%3.01%0.00%
PBL
PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF
2.05%2.21%6.89%7.92%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBL and INCM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBL has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to INCM (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBL dropped -11.69% vs INCM's -7.84%.

On 1-year performance, PBL leads with 19.49% vs 15.73% for INCM. On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBL has performed better with a 19.49% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PBL.

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 2.05% for PBL.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PBL and 0.38% for INCM.

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBL and INCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer