PBJN vs. APRB
PBJN (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBJN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
PBJN vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBJN achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.
PBJN
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBJN vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBJN PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June | 3.15% | 2.04% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBJN and APRB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBJN vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
PBJN
APRB
PBJN vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBJN | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBJN | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 2.00 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
PBJN vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBJN drawdown since its inception was -8.70%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJN and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBJN | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -4.59% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.11% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -0.74% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility
PBJN vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBJN | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 5.98% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 5.98% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 5.98% | +1.35% |
PBJN vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBJN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBJN vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBJN nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBJN and APRB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBJN.
PBJN and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBJN and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for PBJN and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer