PBFB vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBFB (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. PBFB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

PBFB vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PBFB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 13.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFB vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	3.76%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

Return for Risk

PBFB vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 86
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFB vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBFB	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBFB	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	—	—

Drawdowns

PBFB vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFB drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFB and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBFB	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	0.00%	-8.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	0.00%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBFB	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.77%	0.00%	+4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.39%	0.00%	+6.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.39%	0.00%	+6.39%

PBFB vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBFB vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PBFB nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PBFB or JULQ?

On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBFB or JULQ?

PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for JULQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBFB or JULQ?

PBFB and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PBFB and JULQ?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFB and 0.79% for JULQ.