PBFB vs. HOCT
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT).
PBFB and HOCT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBFB is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. HOCT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Sep 29, 2023.
Performance
PBFB vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBFB vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February | -2.19% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
PBFB
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 10.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBFB vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBFB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBFB vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
PBFB
HOCT
PBFB vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBFB | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBFB | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | — | — |
Dividends
PBFB vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBFB nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PBFB vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBFB drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFB and HOCT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBFB | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | 0.00% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | 0.00% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | — | — |
Volatility
PBFB vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBFB | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.31% | 0.00% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 0.00% | +6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 0.00% | +6.54% |