PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBFB vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBFB vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PBFB

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.70%
YTD
4.68%
6M
5.66%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFB vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBFB vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFB
PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFB vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFBHOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.17

PBFB vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBFBHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.67

Drawdowns

PBFB vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFB drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFB and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFBHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

0.00%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

0.00%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

Volatility

PBFB vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBFBHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.77%

0.00%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

0.00%

+6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.39%

0.00%

+6.39%

PBFB vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBFB vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PBFB nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PBFB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBFB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

PBFB and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFB and 0.79% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBFB and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer