PBEAX vs. FGIPX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PBEAX (PGIM Jennison Value Fund) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PBEAX returned 14.11%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PBEAX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.

Performance

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBEAX achieves a 18.04% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 23.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PBEAX has outperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 14.11%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.

PBEAX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 12.65%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 1Y: 30.59%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: 14.11%
• ALL TIME*: 9.93%

FGIPX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 3.99%
• 6M: 14.52%
• YTD: 23.50%
• 1Y: 47.21%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 17.82%
• 10Y*: 13.29%
• ALL TIME*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	18.04%	16.38%	27.95%	14.54%	-8.68%	26.72%	2.75%	36.07%	-10.53%	16.31%
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	23.50%	30.18%	15.44%	12.17%	3.28%	21.73%	-4.59%	25.96%	-9.95%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PBEAX and FGIPX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013	0.93

The correlation between PBEAX and FGIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBEAX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBEAX

PBEAX Risk / Return Rank: 91
PBEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PBEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PBEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PBEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FGIPX

FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBEAX	FGIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	3.88	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	5.30	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.70	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	6.32	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.38	24.49	-9.10

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBEAX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBEAX drawdown since its inception was -58.23%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBEAX and FGIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBEAX	FGIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.23%	-37.32%	-20.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.99%	-7.26%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-13.27%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.02%	-16.19%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.31%	-37.32%	-0.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-4.13%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	1.88%	+0.02%

Volatility

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Value Fund (PBEAX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.51%. This indicates that PBEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBEAX	FGIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	2.51%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.29%	8.69%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	11.88%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.13%	14.85%	+0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	17.05%	+0.45%

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBEAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBEAX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

PBEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%, less than FGIPX's 9.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class	9.33%	11.68%	12.69%	7.50%	7.35%	12.20%	2.13%	52.72%	25.63%	5.58%	4.22%	5.88%
PBEAX PGIM Jennison Value Fund	8.57%	10.12%	14.05%	7.33%	8.28%	6.93%	4.01%	16.61%	10.18%	6.90%	4.26%	8.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBEAX and FGIPX in my portfolio?

PBEAX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBEAX or FGIPX?

PBEAX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FGIPX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBEAX dropped -58.23% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.