PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

PBD.TO (Purpose Total Return Bond Fund) and PMIF-U.TO (PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBD.TO returned 1.56% vs 9.97% for PMIF-U.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBD.TO charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for PMIF-U.TO.

Performance

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Total Return Bond Fund (PBD.TO) and PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PBD.TO is traded in CAD, while PMIF-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PMIF-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBD.TO achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than PMIF-U.TO's 3.29% return.

PBD.TO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: -0.28%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 1Y: 1.56%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 2.02%
• ALL TIME*: 2.30%

PMIF-U.TO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.14%
• 6M: 2.14%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 1Y: 9.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBD.TO Purpose Total Return Bond Fund	CA$31.97K	CA$21.56K	CA$18.22K
PMIF-U.TO PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)	CA$208.48K	CA$192.68K	CA$199.54K

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PBD.TO Purpose Total Return Bond Fund	0.08%	4.22%	4.89%	0.12%
PMIF-U.TO PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)	3.29%	5.70%	14.73%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023	0.06

Return for Risk

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBD.TO

PBD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
PBD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
PBD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PBD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PBD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
PBD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PMIF-U.TO

PMIF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PMIF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PMIF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PMIF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PMIF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Total Return Bond Fund (PBD.TO) and PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBD.TO	PMIF-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.81	-1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.66	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.31	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	2.99	-2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	7.10	-4.54

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the PMIF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBD.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, which is greater than PMIF-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBD.TO	PMIF-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.68%	-6.19%	-11.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.19%	-3.34%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-2.51%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-1.39%	-0.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	1.41%	-0.80%

Volatility

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Total Return Bond Fund (PBD.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada) (PMIF-U.TO) at 1.14%. This indicates that PBD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMIF-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBD.TO	PMIF-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.14%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	4.22%	-1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	5.58%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.81%	6.44%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.79%	6.44%	+0.35%

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBD.TO has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PMIF-U.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBD.TO vs. PMIF-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

PBD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than PMIF-U.TO's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBD.TO Purpose Total Return Bond Fund	4.36%	4.28%	4.27%	4.25%	3.80%	3.43%	3.32%	3.68%	3.85%	4.50%	3.68%	3.81%
PMIF-U.TO PIMCO Monthly Income Fund (Canada)	5.72%	5.50%	6.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO in my portfolio?

PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBD.TO or PMIF-U.TO?

On fees, PMIF-U.TO is cheaper at 0.84% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBD.TO or PMIF-U.TO?

PMIF-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for PBD.TO.

What is the main difference between PBD.TO and PMIF-U.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Purpose Investments Inc. and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for PBD.TO and 0.84% for PMIF-U.TO.