PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO
PBD.TO (Purpose Total Return Bond Fund) and IGB.TO (Purpose Global Bond Class) are both exchange-traded funds - PBD.TO is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc., while IGB.TO is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Purpose Investments Inc.. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBD.TO returned 1.51%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for IGB.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBD.TO charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IGB.TO.
Performance
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBD.TO achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than IGB.TO's -0.32% return.
PBD.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 1.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
IGB.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$95.58K | CA$158.59K | CA$295.38K | |
| CA$31.97K | CA$21.56K | CA$18.22K |
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD.TO Purpose Total Return Bond Fund | 0.08% | 4.22% | 4.89% | 4.80% | -6.19% | 0.05% | 6.85% | 6.23% | -2.48% |
IGB.TO Purpose Global Bond Class | -0.32% | 6.05% | 7.47% | 7.40% | -7.68% | 2.50% | 6.12% | 3.21% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBD.TO and IGB.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PBD.TO and IGB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PBD.TO
IGB.TO
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Total Return Bond Fund (PBD.TO) and Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBD.TO | IGB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.12 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 2.16 | +0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBD.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.68%, which is greater than IGB.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBD.TO and IGB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBD.TO | IGB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -16.40% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.19% | -2.86% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.41% | -4.28% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.12% | -12.34% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.60% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -2.37% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.82% | -0.21% |
Volatility
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Total Return Bond Fund (PBD.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Purpose Global Bond Class (IGB.TO) at 0.73%. This indicates that PBD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBD.TO | IGB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 0.73% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 2.37% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 2.81% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 4.79% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.79% | 5.75% | +1.04% |
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBD.TO has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than IGB.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBD.TO vs. IGB.TO - Dividend Comparison
PBD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than IGB.TO's 4.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGB.TO Purpose Global Bond Class | 4.86% | 5.18% | 5.23% | 4.58% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 3.48% | 2.86% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBD.TO Purpose Total Return Bond Fund | 4.36% | 4.28% | 4.27% | 4.25% | 3.80% | 3.43% | 3.32% | 3.68% | 3.85% | 4.50% | 3.68% | 3.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBD.TO and IGB.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGB.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGB.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for PBD.TO.
PBD.TO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IGB.TO is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for PBD.TO and 0.55% for IGB.TO.
Find the right allocation for PBD.TO and IGB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer