PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBBBX vs. SMARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBBBX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than SMARX's 0.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PBBBX having a 2.89% annualized return and SMARX not far ahead at 2.99%.


PBBBX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
2.89%

SMARX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5.50%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBBBX
PIA BBB Bond Fund
0.13%8.14%2.41%9.19%-16.35%-1.20%9.37%16.49%-3.02%7.16%
SMARX
Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust
0.48%6.91%3.73%9.76%-11.77%0.76%6.55%7.77%-1.13%4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PBBBX and SMARX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2005

0.67

The correlation between PBBBX and SMARX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBBBX vs. SMARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBBBX
PBBBX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PBBBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBBBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBBBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PBBBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBBBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SMARX
SMARX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SMARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMARX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SMARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMARX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBBBXSMARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.97

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

6.83

-1.07

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBBBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SMARX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBBBX and SMARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBBBXSMARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.36

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.41

+0.34

Drawdowns

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBBBX drawdown since its inception was -23.00%, smaller than the maximum SMARX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBBBX and SMARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBBBXSMARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.00%

-47.07%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-2.61%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-5.19%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.00%

-16.20%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.00%

-16.20%

-6.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.82%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-6.97%

+3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.75%

+0.30%

Volatility

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Volatility Comparison

PIA BBB Bond Fund (PBBBX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) at 1.31%. This indicates that PBBBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBBBXSMARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.31%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.83%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

3.76%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

5.16%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.02%

4.39%

+1.63%

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBBBX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMARX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBBBX vs. SMARX - Dividend Comparison

PBBBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than SMARX's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBBBX
PIA BBB Bond Fund
3.79%4.02%3.82%3.57%3.24%2.85%3.16%3.78%4.20%3.75%3.95%4.12%
SMARX
Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust
4.78%5.02%4.07%3.85%3.53%2.57%3.35%4.19%4.55%4.20%4.87%5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBBBX and SMARX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBBBX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to SMARX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBBBX dropped -23.00% vs SMARX's -47.07%.

PBBBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBBBX and SMARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer