PBAP vs. HOCT
PBAP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. PBAP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.
Performance
PBAP vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PBAP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBAP vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April | 6.23% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBAP vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
PBAP
HOCT
PBAP vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBAP | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.41 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.84 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 85.46 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBAP | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PBAP vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBAP drawdown since its inception was -9.70%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAP and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBAP | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | 0.00% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | — | — |
Volatility
PBAP vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBAP | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 0.00% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 0.00% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 0.00% | +7.11% |
PBAP vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBAP vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBAP nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, PBAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.
PBAP and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBAP and 0.79% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for PBAP and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer