PBAP vs. JULQ
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ).
PBAP and JULQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PBAP is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Mar 28, 2024. JULQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jun 30, 2023.
Performance
PBAP vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBAP vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PBAP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April | 0.90% |
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
PBAP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBAP vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBAP vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank
PBAP
JULQ
PBAP vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - April (PBAP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBAP | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBAP | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | — | — |
Dividends
PBAP vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither PBAP nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PBAP vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBAP drawdown since its inception was -9.70%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAP and JULQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBAP | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.70% | 0.00% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | 0.00% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility
PBAP vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBAP | JULQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.26% | 0.00% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 0.00% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 0.00% | +7.33% |