PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBAMX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund (PBAMX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBAMX achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than FTLSX's 5.19% return.


PBAMX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.88%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.31%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

FTLSX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.89%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.44%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PBAMX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund
8.54%16.68%13.83%24.49%-15.93%16.47%13.78%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
5.19%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PBAMX and FTLSX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.72

The correlation between PBAMX and FTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBAMX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBAMX
PBAMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PBAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PBAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund (PBAMX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBAMXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.67

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.98

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.55

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.32

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.50

14.65

+0.85

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBAMX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBAMXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.67

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.65

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.96

-0.18

Drawdowns

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBAMX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBAMX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBAMXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-15.74%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-3.65%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.67%

-4.83%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.81%

-15.74%

-6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-2.81%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

0.82%

+0.59%

Volatility

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund (PBAMX) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.79%. This indicates that PBAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBAMXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

1.79%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

3.80%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

4.54%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

5.43%

+6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

4.78%

+9.84%

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBAMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBAMX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

PBAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than FTLSX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.53%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%
PBAMX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2040 Fund
10.61%11.51%7.46%3.34%12.96%14.65%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBAMX and FTLSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBAMX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to FTLSX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBAMX dropped -27.57% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBAMX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer