PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYC vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYC vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYC achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly higher than META's -15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYC has underperformed META with an annualized return of 13.52%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


PAYC

1D
1.51%
1M
22.39%
6M
22.34%
YTD
3.45%
1Y
-28.52%
3Y*
-23.20%
5Y*
-15.91%
10Y*
13.52%
ALL TIME*
19.99%

META

1D
3.28%
1M
-9.17%
6M
-22.16%
YTD
-15.51%
1Y
-27.79%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
16.39%
ALL TIME*
20.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.87B$11.79B$10.93B
$122.41M$116.28M$133.30M

PAYC vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
3.45%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%70.82%116.22%52.43%76.59%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-15.51%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYC and META is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2014

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between PAYC and META has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYC:

$8.95B

META:

$1.42T

EPS

PAYC:

$8.66

META:

$26.51

PE Ratio

PAYC:

18.93

META:

21.00

PEG Ratio

PAYC:

0.71

META:

0.86

PS Ratio

PAYC:

4.25

META:

6.27

PB Ratio

PAYC:

10.34

META:

5.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYC:

$2.09B

META:

$228.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYC:

$1.70B

META:

$186.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYC:

$803.80M

META:

$107.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYC vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAYC vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYCMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.89

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.84

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

-1.52

+0.70

PAYC vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYC Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is comparable to the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYC and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYC vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYC drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYC and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYCMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-76.74%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.11%

-33.30%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.27%

-34.15%

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-76.74%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-76.74%

-2.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.60%

-29.30%

-40.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.71%

-15.90%

-11.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.70%

18.25%

+16.45%

Volatility

PAYC vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) have volatilities of 15.15% and 15.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYCMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

15.37%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.60%

30.29%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.05%

39.78%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.08%

44.68%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.73%

39.10%

+5.63%

Dividends

PAYC vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than META's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
0.91%0.94%0.73%0.54%

Financials

PAYC vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paycom Software, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PAYC vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paycom Software, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PAYC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a gross profit of 484.60M and revenue of 571.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.47B and revenue of 60.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

PAYC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported an operating income of 210.20M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 18.78B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

PAYC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a net income of 155.70M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 15.85B and revenue of 60.80B, resulting in a net margin of 26.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYC and META have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to PAYC (15.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYC dropped -78.99% vs META's -76.74%.

PAYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYC and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer