PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYC vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYC achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYC has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 13.52%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.


PAYC

1D
1.51%
1M
22.39%
6M
22.34%
YTD
3.45%
1Y
-28.52%
3Y*
-23.20%
5Y*
-15.91%
10Y*
13.52%
ALL TIME*
19.99%

LLY

1D
-0.53%
1M
-3.60%
6M
11.14%
YTD
7.26%
1Y
56.33%
3Y*
37.33%
5Y*
37.67%
10Y*
32.12%
ALL TIME*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.62B$2.84B$3.35B
$122.41M$116.28M$133.30M

PAYC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
3.45%-21.70%-0.04%-33.06%-25.26%-8.19%70.82%116.22%52.43%76.59%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
7.26%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYC and LLY is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2014

0.18

The correlation between PAYC and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYC:

$8.95B

LLY:

$1.08T

EPS

PAYC:

$8.66

LLY:

$28.16

PE Ratio

PAYC:

18.93

LLY:

40.80

PEG Ratio

PAYC:

0.71

LLY:

0.82

PS Ratio

PAYC:

4.25

LLY:

14.27

PB Ratio

PAYC:

10.34

LLY:

32.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYC:

$2.09B

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYC:

$1.70B

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYC:

$803.80M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAYC
PAYC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PAYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAYC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYCLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.28

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

2.44

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

6.60

-7.43

PAYC vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYC Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYC and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYC drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYC and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYCLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.99%

-68.24%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.11%

-23.18%

-27.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.27%

-34.48%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.99%

-34.48%

-44.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.99%

-34.48%

-44.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.60%

-7.02%

-62.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.71%

-19.17%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.70%

8.56%

+26.14%

Volatility

PAYC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 8.88%. This indicates that PAYC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYCLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

8.88%

+6.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.60%

27.69%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.05%

38.37%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.08%

32.64%

+12.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.73%

30.37%

+14.36%

Dividends

PAYC vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than LLY's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.56%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
PAYC
Paycom Software, Inc.
0.91%0.94%0.73%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PAYC vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paycom Software, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PAYC vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paycom Software, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PAYC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a gross profit of 484.60M and revenue of 571.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

PAYC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported an operating income of 210.20M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

PAYC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a net income of 155.70M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYC and LLY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAYC has higher volatility (15.15%) compared to LLY (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYC dropped -78.99% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYC and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer