PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAXJ.L is traded in USD, while IIND.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IIND.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXJ.L achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than IIND.L's -13.25% return.


PAXJ.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
8.70%
6M
12.99%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IIND.L

1D
1.22%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-13.25%
6M
-12.59%
1Y
-12.21%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
8.70%20.68%6.36%
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-13.25%4.39%2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXJ.L and IIND.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.27

The correlation between PAXJ.L and IIND.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAXJ.L
IIND.L

Financial Services

46.1%
28.3%

Basic Materials

14.6%
8.0%

Industrials

8.5%
10.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
12.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
6.2%

Utilities

3.6%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.2%

Energy

2.9%
9.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.7%

Technology

1.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

PAXJ.L
46.1%
IIND.L
28.3%

Basic Materials

PAXJ.L
14.6%
IIND.L
8.0%

Industrials

PAXJ.L
8.5%
IIND.L
10.3%

Real Estate

PAXJ.L
7.8%
IIND.L
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PAXJ.L
6.0%
IIND.L
12.5%

Healthcare

PAXJ.L
3.7%
IIND.L
6.2%

Utilities

PAXJ.L
3.6%
IIND.L
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PAXJ.L
3.0%
IIND.L
6.2%

Energy

PAXJ.L
2.9%
IIND.L
9.5%

Communication Services

PAXJ.L
2.7%
IIND.L
4.7%

Technology

PAXJ.L
1.1%
IIND.L
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXJ.L
PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

IIND.L
IIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXJ.LIIND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.89

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

-0.59

+4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

-1.41

+12.58

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the IIND.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXJ.L and IIND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXJ.LIIND.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

-0.73

+2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.93

0.30

+1.63

Drawdowns

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -17.04%, smaller than the maximum IIND.L drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXJ.L and IIND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXJ.LIIND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.04%

-42.33%

+25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-20.62%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-20.68%

+17.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-8.67%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.66%

Volatility

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) is 4.50%, while iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that PAXJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXJ.LIIND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

6.41%

-1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

14.18%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

16.57%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.08%

17.41%

+9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.08%

21.92%

+5.16%

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXJ.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IIND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXJ.L vs. IIND.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while IIND.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXJ.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.08%3.34%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXJ.L and IIND.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IIND.L.

PAXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while IIND.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXJ.L and 0.65% for IIND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXJ.L and IIND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer