PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than XMTW.L's 59.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PAXG.L has underperformed XMTW.L with an annualized return of 7.73%, while XMTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.


PAXG.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.79%
6M
9.11%
YTD
10.98%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
11.80%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
7.73%

XMTW.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-5.52%
6M
52.49%
YTD
59.75%
1Y
86.94%
3Y*
39.06%
5Y*
20.90%
10Y*
20.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
10.98%12.31%6.85%-0.04%5.42%5.32%3.46%13.91%-3.83%16.22%
XMTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C
59.75%23.98%25.99%21.66%-21.11%28.96%32.40%29.87%-3.20%16.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXG.L and XMTW.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.62

The correlation between PAXG.L and XMTW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAXG.L
XMTW.L

Financial Services

45.0%
10.6%

Basic Materials

16.3%
2.0%

Industrials

8.5%
2.3%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
1.1%

Utilities

3.5%

-

Healthcare

3.3%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.7%

Energy

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.6%
1.3%

Technology

1.0%
81.4%

Financial Services

PAXG.L
45.0%
XMTW.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

PAXG.L
16.3%
XMTW.L
2.0%

Industrials

PAXG.L
8.5%
XMTW.L
2.3%

Real Estate

PAXG.L
7.8%
XMTW.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

PAXG.L
6.3%
XMTW.L
1.1%

Utilities

PAXG.L
3.5%
XMTW.L

-

Healthcare

PAXG.L
3.3%
XMTW.L
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

PAXG.L
3.0%
XMTW.L
0.7%

Energy

PAXG.L
2.7%
XMTW.L

-

Communication Services

PAXG.L
2.6%
XMTW.L
1.3%

Technology

PAXG.L
1.0%
XMTW.L
81.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XMTW.L
XMTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAXG.LXMTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.55

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

7.63

-5.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.95

22.06

-16.11

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXG.L and XMTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum XMTW.L drawdown of -99.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and XMTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXG.LXMTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-99.22%

+49.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-11.34%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-28.76%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.67%

-30.18%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.37%

-30.18%

-2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-11.34%

+10.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-22.16%

+9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.93%

-1.23%

Volatility

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) is 2.56%, while Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that PAXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXG.LXMTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

11.83%

-9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

22.20%

-13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

25.59%

-14.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

25.20%

-11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

22.49%

-7.25%

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMTW.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXG.L vs. XMTW.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while XMTW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
3.05%3.38%5.61%4.03%4.41%3.74%2.85%4.08%5.57%4.50%4.22%3.29%
XMTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXG.L and XMTW.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XMTW.L.

PAXG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XMTW.L is Taiwan Equities. PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while XMTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.65% for XMTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXG.L and XMTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer