PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than UC48.L's 28.75% return.


PAXG.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.45%
YTD
8.84%
6M
5.98%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*

UC48.L

1D
-1.84%
1M
7.54%
YTD
28.75%
6M
30.26%
1Y
55.93%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
8.84%8.63%1.48%-3.00%-0.45%0.41%0.63%7.84%-4.76%2.47%
UC48.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
28.75%23.58%13.94%-1.31%-10.09%-4.06%20.65%13.67%-10.64%8.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXG.L and UC48.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017

0.31

Over the past year, PAXG.L and UC48.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAXG.L
UC48.L

Financial Services

46.1%
17.7%

Basic Materials

14.6%
3.6%

Industrials

8.5%
8.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
10.3%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
2.4%

Energy

2.9%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.9%

Technology

1.1%
41.6%

Financial Services

PAXG.L
46.1%
UC48.L
17.7%

Basic Materials

PAXG.L
14.6%
UC48.L
3.6%

Industrials

PAXG.L
8.5%
UC48.L
8.3%

Real Estate

PAXG.L
7.8%
UC48.L
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PAXG.L
6.0%
UC48.L
10.3%

Healthcare

PAXG.L
3.7%
UC48.L
3.0%

Utilities

PAXG.L
3.6%
UC48.L
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

PAXG.L
3.0%
UC48.L
2.4%

Energy

PAXG.L
2.9%
UC48.L
2.7%

Communication Services

PAXG.L
2.7%
UC48.L
6.9%

Technology

PAXG.L
1.1%
UC48.L
41.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

UC48.L
UC48.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UC48.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC48.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC48.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UC48.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC48.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXG.LUC48.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.57

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

5.00

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

17.15

-12.54

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the UC48.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXG.L and UC48.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXG.LUC48.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

3.17

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.50

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.47

-0.12

Drawdowns

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, roughly equal to the maximum UC48.L drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and UC48.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXG.LUC48.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.27%

-32.18%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-11.13%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-17.18%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-27.26%

+5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-2.73%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-11.41%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.25%

-0.28%

Volatility

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) is 3.60%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that PAXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC48.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXG.LUC48.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

7.80%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

14.76%

-5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

17.62%

-6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.29%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

18.09%

+5.06%

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UC48.L's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while UC48.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
0.03%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.02%
UC48.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXG.L and UC48.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for UC48.L.

PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while UC48.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.23% for UC48.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXG.L and UC48.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer