PAXG.L vs. UC48.L
PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) and UC48.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while UC48.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAXG.L returned 1.86%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for UC48.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAXG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for UC48.L.
Performance
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than UC48.L's 28.75% return.
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
UC48.L
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 28.75%
- 6M
- 30.26%
- 1Y
- 55.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.84% | 8.63% | 1.48% | -3.00% | -0.45% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 7.84% | -4.76% | 2.47% |
UC48.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 28.75% | 23.58% | 13.94% | -1.31% | -10.09% | -4.06% | 20.65% | 13.67% | -10.64% | 8.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXG.L and UC48.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, PAXG.L and UC48.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Basic Materials
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Industrials
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Real Estate
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Consumer Cyclical
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Healthcare
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Utilities
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Consumer Defensive
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Energy
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Communication Services
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Technology
PAXG.L
UC48.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L — Risk / Return Rank
PAXG.L
UC48.L
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXG.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.57 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 5.00 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 17.15 | -12.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXG.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 3.17 | -1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.50 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, roughly equal to the maximum UC48.L drawdown of -32.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and UC48.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXG.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -32.18% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.45% | -11.13% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.29% | -17.18% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.29% | -27.26% | +5.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -2.73% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -11.41% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.25% | -0.28% |
Volatility
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) is 3.60%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC48.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that PAXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC48.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXG.L | UC48.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 7.80% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 14.76% | -5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 17.62% | -6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.29% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 18.09% | +5.06% |
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than UC48.L's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PAXG.L vs. UC48.L - Dividend Comparison
PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while UC48.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
UC48.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAXG.L and UC48.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for UC48.L.
PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while UC48.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.23% for UC48.L.
Find the right allocation for PAXG.L and UC48.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer