PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) and HMXJ.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAXG.L returned 1.86%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for HMXJ.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAXG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HMXJ.L.

Performance

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PAXG.L having a 8.84% return and HMXJ.L slightly higher at 8.91%.

PAXG.L

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 13.70%
• 3Y*: 6.05%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: —

HMXJ.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 17.57%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	8.84%	8.63%	1.48%	-3.00%	-0.45%	0.41%	0.63%	7.84%	-4.76%	9.31%
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF	8.91%	12.37%	6.43%	0.38%	5.35%	5.41%	3.21%	13.89%	-5.45%	14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXG.L and HMXJ.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016	0.45

Over the past year, PAXG.L and HMXJ.L have become more correlated (0.94) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAXG.L	HMXJ.L
Financial Services	46.1%	45.1%
Basic Materials	14.6%	16.1%
Industrials	8.5%	8.5%
Real Estate	7.8%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	6.3%
Healthcare	3.7%	3.3%
Utilities	3.6%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	3.0%
Energy	2.9%	2.7%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.6%
Technology	1.1%	1.0%

Return for Risk

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXG.L

PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

HMXJ.L

HMXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HMXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HMXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
HMXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HMXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAXG.L	HMXJ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.61	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.40	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.46	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.61	7.37	-2.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the HMXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXG.L and HMXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAXG.L	HMXJ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	1.61	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.44	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.42	-0.07

Drawdowns

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, roughly equal to the maximum HMXJ.L drawdown of -32.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and HMXJ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXG.L	HMXJ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.27%	-32.30%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.45%	-7.12%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.29%	-17.47%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.29%	-17.65%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-2.76%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.86%	-6.74%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.38%	+0.59%

Volatility

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXJ.L) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXG.L	HMXJ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	3.58%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.91%	8.32%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	10.89%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	13.80%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.15%	16.12%	+7.03%

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HMXJ.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAXG.L vs. HMXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than HMXJ.L's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMXJ.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF	3.02%	3.43%	3.80%	4.13%	3.79%	2.71%	3.05%	3.88%	3.80%	3.23%	3.32%	4.03%
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS	0.03%	0.03%	0.06%	0.04%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.04%	0.04%	0.03%	0.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAXG.L and HMXJ.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, PAXG.L and HMXJ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PAXG.L or HMXJ.L?

On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAXG.L or HMXJ.L?

PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXJ.L.

What is the main difference between PAXG.L and HMXJ.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.40% for HMXJ.L.