PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAXG.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 111.17% return.


PAXG.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.45%
YTD
8.84%
6M
5.98%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*

FLRK.L

1D
-5.06%
1M
19.12%
YTD
111.17%
6M
129.46%
1Y
234.17%
3Y*
46.37%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
8.84%8.63%1.48%-3.00%-0.45%0.41%0.63%-1.10%
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
111.17%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXG.L and FLRK.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.31

The correlation between PAXG.L and FLRK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PAXG.L
FLRK.L

Financial Services

46.1%
8.7%

Basic Materials

14.6%
2.4%

Industrials

8.5%
17.7%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
5.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.0%

Utilities

3.6%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
1.7%

Energy

2.9%
0.9%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.3%

Technology

1.1%
57.4%

Financial Services

PAXG.L
46.1%
FLRK.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

PAXG.L
14.6%
FLRK.L
2.4%

Industrials

PAXG.L
8.5%
FLRK.L
17.7%

Real Estate

PAXG.L
7.8%
FLRK.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

PAXG.L
6.0%
FLRK.L
5.5%

Healthcare

PAXG.L
3.7%
FLRK.L
3.0%

Utilities

PAXG.L
3.6%
FLRK.L
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

PAXG.L
3.0%
FLRK.L
1.7%

Energy

PAXG.L
2.9%
FLRK.L
0.9%

Communication Services

PAXG.L
2.7%
FLRK.L
2.3%

Technology

PAXG.L
1.1%
FLRK.L
57.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXG.L
PAXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXG.LFLRK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.85

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

10.98

-9.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

39.30

-34.69

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXG.L and FLRK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXG.LFLRK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

6.24

-5.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.81

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.67

-0.32

Drawdowns

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and FLRK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXG.LFLRK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.27%

-41.57%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-21.18%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.29%

-27.82%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.29%

-38.68%

+17.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-5.62%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-19.95%

+13.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

5.93%

-2.96%

Volatility

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) is 3.60%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that PAXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXG.LFLRK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

18.09%

-14.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

32.92%

-24.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

37.31%

-26.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

25.31%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

27.31%

-4.16%

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAXG.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXG.L
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS
0.03%0.03%0.06%0.04%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.03%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXG.L and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PAXG.L.

PAXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXG.L and FLRK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer