PAXDX vs. GAGEX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) and GAGEX (Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PAXDX returned 3.53%/yr vs 19.26%/yr for GAGEX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAXDX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for GAGEX.

Performance

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXDX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than GAGEX's 29.25% return.

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 3.19%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 1Y: 5.99%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: 3.53%
• 10Y*: —

GAGEX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.81%
• 6M: 23.58%
• YTD: 29.25%
• 1Y: 40.89%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 19.26%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	19.24%
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund	29.25%	16.88%	-1.75%	2.66%	34.32%	45.96%	-34.12%	10.45%	-18.96%	-1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXDX and GAGEX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PAXDX and GAGEX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PAXDX vs. GAGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 20
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GAGEX

GAGEX Risk / Return Rank: 68
GAGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GAGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GAGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
GAGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GAGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAXDX	GAGEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.10	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	2.74	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	2.65	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.36	8.99	-4.63

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the GAGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXDX and GAGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXDX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum GAGEX drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXDX and GAGEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXDX	GAGEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.58%	-78.90%	+45.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.49%	-15.14%	+10.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.56%	-23.67%	+9.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-26.42%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-69.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-8.15%	+7.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.23%	-29.12%	+23.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	4.46%	-2.99%

Volatility

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) is 0.00%, while Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund (GAGEX) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that PAXDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXDX	GAGEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	7.46%	-7.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	15.97%	-12.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.65%	19.15%	-11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	23.65%	-10.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	27.20%	-10.76%

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than GAGEX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAXDX vs. GAGEX - Dividend Comparison

PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than GAGEX's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GAGEX Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund	2.18%	2.82%	7.08%	4.33%	0.15%	2.59%	3.59%	1.91%	1.72%	1.40%	1.13%	1.33%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	1.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAXDX and GAGEX in my portfolio?

PAXDX and GAGEX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAXDX or GAGEX?

GAGEX has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXDX dropped -33.58% vs GAGEX's -78.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GAGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.