PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXDX vs. DHIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXDX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than DHIVX's 11.02% return.


PAXDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.57%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

DHIVX

1D
-1.29%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
11.02%
6M
10.13%
1Y
15.70%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
5.11%18.37%-1.55%9.33%-13.45%14.24%14.25%25.88%-1.60%
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
11.02%16.30%20.25%5.34%-3.28%7.51%-7.17%25.27%-4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXDX and DHIVX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between PAXDX and DHIVX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXDX vs. DHIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXDX
PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DHIVX
DHIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DHIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DHIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXDXDHIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.45

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

7.23

-2.02

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the DHIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXDX and DHIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXDXDHIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.53

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.73

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.56

-0.04

Drawdowns

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXDX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum DHIVX drawdown of -36.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXDX and DHIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXDXDHIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-36.18%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-4.37%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-9.92%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-20.41%

-4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-3.56%

+2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.59%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.08%

-0.61%

Volatility

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) is 0.00%, while Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that PAXDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXDXDHIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.49%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.61%

7.79%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.08%

9.87%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.19%

12.37%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

14.68%

+1.84%

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than DHIVX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXDX vs. DHIVX - Dividend Comparison

PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than DHIVX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DHIVX
Centre Global Infrastructure Fund
3.55%3.66%2.54%1.60%1.85%1.70%2.43%2.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
2.06%2.17%2.07%2.43%2.48%58.94%2.88%4.69%3.55%2.13%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXDX and DHIVX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHIVX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXDX dropped -33.58% vs DHIVX's -36.18%.

DHIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXDX and DHIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer