PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAULX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAULX achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.


PAULX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.59%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
13.25%

YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund
8.96%12.43%22.59%22.23%-15.42%25.18%15.25%29.16%-3.65%16.92%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PAULX and YFSIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between PAULX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAULX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAULX
PAULX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PAULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAULX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PAULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAULX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAULXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.31

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

7.30

+3.53

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAULX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAULXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.54

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.59

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.82

+0.04

Drawdowns

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAULX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAULX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAULXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-35.10%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-14.20%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.33%

-14.20%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.11%

-25.14%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-4.90%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

4.47%

-2.57%

Volatility

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund (PAULX) is 2.96%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that PAULX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAULXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

5.82%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

20.77%

-12.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

21.35%

-10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.39%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

16.25%

+0.73%

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAULX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAULX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

PAULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAULX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund
6.79%7.40%6.30%0.16%4.05%6.85%0.59%3.21%7.52%2.10%0.59%5.25%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAULX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to PAULX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAULX dropped -33.69% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

PAULX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAULX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer