PATX vs. BEX
PATX (Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF) and BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. PATX is passively managed, while BEX is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. PATX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for BEX.
Performance
PATX vs. BEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PATX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 13.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEX
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PATX vs. BEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PATX Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF | 7.25% |
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | -8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATX and BEX is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATX vs. BEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long PATH Daily ETF (PATX) and Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PATX | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.72 | -0.61 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
PATX vs. BEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATX drawdown since its inception was -70.28%, which is greater than BEX's maximum drawdown of -18.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATX and BEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATX | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.28% | -18.65% | -51.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.95% | -8.87% | -48.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -9.34% | -43.15% |
Volatility
PATX vs. BEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATX | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.88% | 170.67% | -46.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.88% | 170.67% | -46.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.88% | 170.67% | -46.79% |
PATX vs. BEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PATX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BEX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PATX vs. BEX - Dividend Comparison
Neither PATX nor BEX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PATX and BEX have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for PATX.
PATX and BEX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.49% for PATX and 1.30% for BEX.
Find the right allocation for PATX and BEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer