PARFX vs. PRVBX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (PARFX) and Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX).
PARFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. PRVBX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Sep 27, 1991.
Performance
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PARFX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund | -3.76% | 18.56% | 13.90% | 20.55% | -19.31% | 17.22% | 18.32% | 25.12% | -7.93% | 20.76% |
PRVBX Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio | -0.17% | 5.66% | 5.78% | 6.91% | -5.91% | 2.93% | 9.88% | 9.29% | 2.01% | 0.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PARFX achieves a -3.76% return, which is significantly lower than PRVBX's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PARFX has outperformed PRVBX with an annualized return of 9.98%, while PRVBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.67% annualized return.
PARFX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -9.37%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.98%
PRVBX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PARFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PARFX vs. PRVBX — Risk / Return Rank
PARFX
PRVBX
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (PARFX) and Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PARFX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 2.21 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 3.21 | -1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.45 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 2.77 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 10.85 | -6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PARFX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.21 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.13 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.07 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.29 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between PARFX and PRVBX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Dividend Comparison
PARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than PRVBX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PARFX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund | 3.97% | 3.82% | 1.69% | 4.32% | 7.60% | 6.77% | 4.27% | 5.55% | 8.33% | 2.34% | 3.11% | 4.00% |
PRVBX Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio | 4.19% | 4.18% | 3.61% | 3.16% | 1.83% | 0.85% | 4.73% | 2.51% | 1.71% | 3.30% | 3.27% | 5.71% |
Drawdowns
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PARFX drawdown since its inception was -53.67%, which is greater than PRVBX's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PARFX and PRVBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PARFX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.67% | -16.91% | -36.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -1.51% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -8.22% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.52% | -16.91% | -15.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -1.30% | -8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -0.72% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 0.38% | +2.17% |
Volatility
PARFX vs. PRVBX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (PARFX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) at 0.73%. This indicates that PARFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRVBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PARFX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 0.73% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 1.21% | +7.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 1.85% | +13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 2.33% | +12.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 4.38% | +10.97% |