PAPR vs. OCTB
PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PAPR is passively managed, while OCTB is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.
Performance
PAPR vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than OCTB's 6.18% return.
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.72% | 2.14% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 6.18% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAPR and OCTB is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAPR vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank
PAPR
OCTB
PAPR vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAPR | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAPR | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.97 | -1.14 |
Drawdowns
PAPR vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and OCTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAPR | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -4.79% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.17% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.70% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | — | — |
Volatility
PAPR vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAPR | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 7.20% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 7.20% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 7.20% | +2.24% |
PAPR vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAPR vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAPR nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAPR and OCTB have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAPR.
PAPR and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PAPR and 0.25% for OCTB.
Find the right allocation for PAPR and OCTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer