PAPR vs. BAPR
PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index while BAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAPR returned 8.37%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for BAPR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PAPR vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAPR achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.81% return.
PAPR
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 14.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.72% | 6.58% | 12.28% | 16.45% | -4.29% | 7.51% | 4.62% | 6.47% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.81% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -7.04% | 12.58% | 6.19% | 10.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAPR and BAPR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PAPR and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
PAPR vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAPR
BAPR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PAPR
BAPR
Financial Services
PAPR
BAPR
Communication Services
PAPR
BAPR
Consumer Cyclical
PAPR
BAPR
Healthcare
PAPR
BAPR
Industrials
PAPR
BAPR
Consumer Defensive
PAPR
BAPR
Energy
PAPR
BAPR
Utilities
PAPR
BAPR
Real Estate
PAPR
BAPR
Basic Materials
PAPR
BAPR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAPR vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PAPR
BAPR
PAPR vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAPR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.56 | 3.59 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.35 | 6.11 | +2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.12 | 1.87 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 18.05 | 10.46 | +7.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.05 | 57.55 | +24.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAPR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56 | 3.59 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.98 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PAPR vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPR and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAPR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -23.91% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | -1.93% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -15.58% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.87% | -15.58% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.23% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -2.59% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.35% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PAPR vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is 0.86%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that PAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAPR | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 1.06% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 4.53% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 5.64% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 11.49% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.44% | 13.12% | -3.68% |
PAPR vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PAPR and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PAPR vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAPR nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAPR and BAPR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAPR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to PAPR (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPR dropped -15.31% vs BAPR's -23.91%.
On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 8.37% for PAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPR and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PAPR and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect April Series Index, while BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April.
PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAPR and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer