PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAPPX vs. NEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PAPPX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPPX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 52.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PAPPX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 8.28%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.


PAPPX

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.09%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
8.28%

NEEGX

1D
0.43%
1M
11.34%
YTD
52.15%
6M
52.72%
1Y
93.06%
3Y*
26.75%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAPPX
Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth Fund
0.56%4.72%2.64%11.49%-22.71%14.71%24.74%34.77%-3.03%25.79%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
52.15%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PAPPX and NEEGX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2010

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between PAPPX and NEEGX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAPPX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPPX
PAPPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PAPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PAPPX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAPPXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

3.50

-3.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

4.05

-3.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.53

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

6.83

-6.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.60

23.25

-21.66

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPPX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAPPXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

3.50

-3.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.49

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Drawdowns

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPPX drawdown since its inception was -34.51%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPPX and NEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAPPXNEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.51%

-53.60%

+19.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-13.27%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-38.66%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.93%

-43.35%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.51%

-43.35%

+8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

0.00%

-7.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-10.90%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

3.90%

-0.27%

Volatility

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PAPPX) is 3.64%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that PAPPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAPPXNEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

8.81%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

20.49%

-10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

26.80%

-13.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

28.23%

-10.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

25.24%

-6.52%

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPPX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAPPX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

PAPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than NEEGX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
4.97%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%
PAPPX
Papp Small & Mid-Cap Growth Fund
3.14%3.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.68%2.19%2.97%3.03%8.33%0.00%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAPPX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEEGX has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to PAPPX (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPPX dropped -34.51% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAPPX and NEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer