PAPI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PAPI returned 13.61% vs 12.34% for OMAH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAPI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

PAPI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPI achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.13% return.

PAPI

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 13.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF	6.49%	4.41%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.13%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PAPI and OMAH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.66

The correlation between PAPI and OMAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAPI vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAPI	OMAH
Technology	12.5%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	4.1%
Energy	11.6%	10.5%
Healthcare	10.7%	7.0%
Utilities	10.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	16.2%
Financial Services	9.9%	38.9%
Industrials	9.9%	-
Basic Materials	7.8%	-
Communication Services	5.4%	9.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

PAPI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPI

PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 38
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 35

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAPI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.54	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.17	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	4.12	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.35	10.16	-4.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAPI vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPI and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAPI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.54	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.74	+0.16

Drawdowns

PAPI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPI drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAPI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.27%	-11.83%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.86%	-3.00%	-3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.45%	-2.12%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-1.26%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	1.22%	+1.33%

Volatility

PAPI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.99%. This indicates that PAPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAPI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	1.99%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.02%	5.50%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	8.06%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.76%	13.20%	-1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.76%	13.20%	-1.44%

PAPI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAPI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

PAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, less than OMAH's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.36%	12.86%	0.00%	0.00%
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF	7.57%	7.59%	7.07%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAPI and OMAH in my portfolio?

PAPI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAPI or OMAH?

PAPI has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to OMAH (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPI dropped -14.27% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, PAPI or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 13.61% vs 12.34% for OMAH. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAPI or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAPI or OMAH?

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAPI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 7.57% for PAPI.

What is the main difference between PAPI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PAPI and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.