PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAPI vs. GMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAPI vs. GMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAPI achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than GMMF's 1.47% return.


PAPI

1D
0.64%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6.49%
6M
6.38%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMMF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAPI vs. GMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PAPI and GMMF is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAPI vs. GMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GMMF
GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAPI vs. GMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAPIGMMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-83.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

24.62

-23.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

128.79

-126.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

1,307.33

-1,301.98

PAPI vs. GMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the GMMF Sharpe Ratio of 17.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAPI and GMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAPIGMMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

17.42

-16.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

16.31

-15.41

Drawdowns

PAPI vs. GMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAPI drawdown since its inception was -14.27%, which is greater than GMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAPI and GMMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAPIGMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.27%

-0.03%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-0.03%

-6.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

0.00%

-4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-0.00%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

0.00%

+2.55%

Volatility

PAPI vs. GMMF - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) at 0.06%. This indicates that PAPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAPIGMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

0.06%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

0.14%

+6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

0.22%

+10.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

0.24%

+11.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

0.24%

+11.52%

PAPI vs. GMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAPI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GMMF's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAPI vs. GMMF - Dividend Comparison

PAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than GMMF's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GMMF
iShares Government Money Market ETF
3.67%3.45%0.00%0.00%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.57%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAPI and GMMF have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAPI has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to GMMF (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAPI dropped -14.27% vs GMMF's -0.03%.

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 13.61% vs 3.84% for GMMF. On fees, GMMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GMMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 3.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GMMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PAPI.

PAPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.57%, compared with 3.67% for GMMF.

PAPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while GMMF is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PAPI and 0.20% for GMMF.

GMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.42 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAPI and GMMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer