PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. REGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PANW vs. REGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 51.60% return, which is significantly higher than REGN's -18.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed REGN with an annualized return of 28.21%, while REGN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.


PANW

1D
-0.42%
1M
51.78%
YTD
51.60%
6M
42.71%
1Y
43.89%
3Y*
35.04%
5Y*
36.21%
10Y*
28.21%

REGN

1D
1.58%
1M
-10.34%
YTD
-18.32%
6M
-12.78%
1Y
30.36%
3Y*
-5.46%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
4.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. REGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
51.60%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-18.32%8.96%-18.90%21.73%14.25%30.72%28.66%0.53%-0.65%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and REGN is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2012

0.24

The correlation between PANW and REGN shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PANW:

$207.76B

REGN:

$67.71B

EPS

PANW:

$1.17

REGN:

$41.05

PE Ratio

PANW:

238.15

REGN:

15.32

PS Ratio

PANW:

18.92

REGN:

4.54

PB Ratio

PANW:

7.51

REGN:

2.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANW:

$10.61B

REGN:

$14.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANW:

$7.63B

REGN:

$12.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

PANW:

$1.33B

REGN:

$5.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. REGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

REGN
REGN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
REGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
REGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. REGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PANWREGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.18

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

4.09

-1.30

PANW vs. REGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the REGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and REGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PANWREGNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

0.93

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.14

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.14

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.16

+0.56

Drawdowns

PANW vs. REGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum REGN drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and REGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWREGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-91.81%

+43.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-25.85%

-10.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-59.69%

+23.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-59.69%

+23.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-59.69%

+11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-47.25%

+40.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-42.39%

+27.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.80%

7.45%

+8.35%

Volatility

PANW vs. REGN - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 16.96% compared to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) at 12.54%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWREGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.96%

12.54%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.66%

22.39%

+9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.38%

32.85%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

30.77%

+10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.57%

32.16%

+6.41%

Dividends

PANW vs. REGN - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


PositionTTM2025
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.58%0.46%

Financials

PANW vs. REGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
3.61B
(PANW) Total Revenue
(REGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PANW vs. REGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
81.4%
Portfolio components
PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

REGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.94B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

REGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 642.90M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.

REGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 727.20M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and REGN have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to REGN (12.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs REGN's -91.81%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and REGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer