PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. IR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PANW vs. IR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 44.59% return, which is significantly higher than IR's -8.49% return.


PANW

1D
-2.10%
1M
28.12%
YTD
44.59%
6M
36.33%
1Y
33.43%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
35.30%
10Y*
28.39%

IR

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-8.49%
6M
-8.59%
1Y
-12.74%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. IR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
44.59%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%24.45%
IR
Ingersoll-Rand Plc
-8.49%-12.34%17.06%48.21%-15.41%35.85%24.21%92.80%-39.73%60.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and IR is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2017

0.26

The correlation between PANW and IR shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PANW:

$1.17

IR:

$1.96

PE Ratio

PANW:

227.13

IR:

36.93

PEG Ratio

PANW:

0.02

IR:

8.78

PS Ratio

PANW:

18.05

IR:

2.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANW:

$10.61B

IR:

$7.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANW:

$7.63B

IR:

$2.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

PANW:

$1.33B

IR:

$1.55B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. IR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IR
IR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IR Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IR Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PANWIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.96

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.42

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

-0.97

+3.09

PANW vs. IR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the IR Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and IR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PANWIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

-0.39

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.30

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.45

+0.25

Drawdowns

PANW vs. IR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IR drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and IR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-50.27%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-30.56%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-36.62%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-36.62%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.37%

-31.12%

+19.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-12.81%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.82%

13.12%

+2.70%

Volatility

PANW vs. IR - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) at 7.68%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

7.68%

+9.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.83%

25.01%

+6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.54%

32.94%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.65%

29.98%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.59%

34.33%

+4.26%

Dividends

PANW vs. IR - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IR
Ingersoll-Rand Plc
0.11%0.10%0.09%0.10%0.15%0.03%0.00%5.78%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PANW vs. IR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
1.85B
(PANW) Total Revenue
(IR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PANW vs. IR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
42.9%
Portfolio components
PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

IR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a gross profit of 792.40M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

IR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported an operating income of 289.70M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.7%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.

IR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ingersoll-Rand Plc reported a net income of 192.10M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and IR have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to IR (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs IR's -50.27%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and IR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer