IR vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IR or NVDA.
Key characteristics
| IR | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.92% | 77.17% |
| 1Y Return | 64.22% | 222.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 22.40% | 78.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 29.71% | 81.85% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.39 | 4.57 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.21% | 49.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.12% | -89.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.85% | -7.65% |
Fundamentals
| IR | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $35.66B | $1.91T |
| EPS | $1.90 | $11.96 |
| PE Ratio | 46.53 | 63.71 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.47 | 1.18 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.88B | $60.92B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.33B | $15.36B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.70B | $34.48B |
Correlation
The correlation between IR and NVDA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IR achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 77.17% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
IR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IR Ingersoll-Rand Plc | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.03% | 2.33% | 5.78% | 9.58% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% | 1.70% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
IR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IR drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IR and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ingersoll-Rand Plc (IR) is 5.75%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 17.13%. This indicates that IR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
IR vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ingersoll-Rand Plc and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities