PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PANW vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 51.80% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 29.12%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 12.31% annualized return.


PANW

1D
0.03%
1M
17.38%
YTD
51.80%
6M
45.87%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
33.77%
5Y*
35.61%
10Y*
29.12%

IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
51.80%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and IAU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PANWIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.19

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.99

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.62

2.83

-0.21

PANW vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PANW vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-45.14%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-24.40%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-24.40%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-24.40%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-24.40%

-23.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-22.03%

+15.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-15.97%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.87%

8.47%

+7.40%

Volatility

PANW vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 16.97% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 7.70%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.97%

7.70%

+9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.33%

23.94%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.96%

27.17%

+11.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.72%

18.16%

+23.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.62%

16.02%

+22.60%

Dividends

PANW vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

Neither PANW nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and IAU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to IAU (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs IAU's -45.14%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer