PANW vs. DNA
PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) and DNA (Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while DNA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, PANW returned 35.61%/yr vs -54.41%/yr for DNA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PANW vs. DNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 51.80% return, which is significantly higher than DNA's -5.05% return.
PANW
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 51.80%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 35.61%
- 10Y*
- 29.12%
DNA
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -15.52%
- 1Y
- -11.74%
- 3Y*
- -53.33%
- 5Y*
- -54.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PANW vs. DNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 51.80% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 51.85% |
DNA Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. | -5.05% | -15.38% | -85.47% | 0.00% | -79.66% | -21.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and DNA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between PANW and DNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PANW:
$208.04B
DNA:
$469.96M
PANW:
$1.17
DNA:
-$5.40
PANW:
18.95
DNA:
3.65
PANW:
7.52
DNA:
1.06
PANW:
$10.61B
DNA:
$121.84M
PANW:
$7.63B
DNA:
$99.27M
PANW:
$1.33B
DNA:
-$218.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PANW vs. DNA — Risk / Return Rank
PANW
DNA
PANW vs. DNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PANW | DNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.23 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | -0.39 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PANW vs. DNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum DNA drawdown of -99.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and DNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PANW | DNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -99.10% | +51.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.01% | -66.05% | +30.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.01% | -94.72% | +58.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -99.10% | +63.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -98.68% | +91.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -79.88% | +65.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 39.10% | -23.23% |
Volatility
PANW vs. DNA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) is 16.97%, while Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) has a volatility of 21.11%. This indicates that PANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PANW | DNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.97% | 21.11% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.33% | 70.92% | -38.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.96% | 97.64% | -58.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.72% | 97.78% | -56.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.62% | 96.33% | -57.71% |
Dividends
PANW vs. DNA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PANW nor DNA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PANW vs. DNA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PANW and DNA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNA has higher volatility (21.11%) compared to PANW (16.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs DNA's -99.10%.
PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PANW and DNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer