PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNA vs. WBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DNA vs. WBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DNA

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
12.27%
6M
8.61%
1Y
30.86%
3Y*
-47.59%
5Y*
-52.72%
10Y*

WBA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNA vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DNA
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.
12.27%-15.38%-85.47%0.00%-79.66%-17.89%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%28.40%-61.34%-25.09%-25.06%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DNA and WBA is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2021

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between DNA and WBA has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

DNA:

$121.84M

WBA:

$154.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DNA:

$99.27M

WBA:

$26.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

DNA:

-$218.90M

WBA:

-$2.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNA vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNA
DNA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WBA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNA vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNAWBADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.90

DNA vs. WBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNAWBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

Drawdowns

DNA vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNAWBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.15%

Volatility

DNA vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNAWBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.48%

Dividends

DNA vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNA nor WBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNA
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WBA
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
0.00%0.00%10.72%7.35%5.13%3.62%4.64%3.04%2.46%2.13%1.78%1.64%

Financials

DNA vs. WBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B202220232024202520260
38.99B
(DNA) Total Revenue
(WBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DNA and WBA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNA and WBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer