PAM vs. DIA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAM (Pampa Energía S.A.) is a stock, while DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the past 10 years, PAM returned 13.21%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for DIA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAM vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAM achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 8.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PAM having a 13.21% annualized return and DIA not far ahead at 13.33%.

PAM

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 7.31%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: -7.26%
• 1Y: 18.01%
• 3Y*: 29.26%
• 5Y*: 37.92%
• 10Y*: 13.21%

DIA

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 23.46%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 10.12%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAM vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAM Pampa Energía S.A.	-4.50%	0.65%	77.58%	55.04%	51.30%	53.19%	-16.13%	-48.35%	-52.72%	93.28%
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	8.03%	14.71%	14.82%	16.02%	-7.02%	20.83%	9.59%	24.70%	-3.74%	28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PAM and DIA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2009	0.28

The correlation between PAM and DIA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAM vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAM

PAM Risk / Return Rank: 54
PAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PAM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
PAM Martin Ratio Rank: 56

DIA

DIA Risk / Return Rank: 56
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAM vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAM	DIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	1.93	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	2.81	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	2.41	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.41	9.34	-7.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAM vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAM and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAM	DIA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	1.93	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	0.69	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.76	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.49	-0.24

Drawdowns

PAM vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAM drawdown since its inception was -87.41%, which is greater than DIA's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAM and DIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAM	DIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.41%	-51.87%	-35.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.59%	-9.76%	-21.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.40%	-15.95%	-24.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.40%	-20.76%	-19.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.41%	-36.70%	-50.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.91%	0.00%	-10.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.44%	-7.14%	-35.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.82%	2.52%	+10.30%

Volatility

PAM vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) at 3.28%. This indicates that PAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAM	DIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.50%	3.28%	+9.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.95%	9.41%	+14.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.48%	12.20%	+39.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.27%	14.80%	+31.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.93%	17.54%	+34.39%

Dividends

PAM vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

PAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	1.36%	1.43%	1.61%	1.81%	1.91%	1.58%	1.87%	1.85%	2.24%	1.97%	2.26%	2.33%
PAM Pampa Energía S.A.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAM and DIA in my portfolio?

PAM and DIA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAM or DIA?

PAM has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to DIA (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAM dropped -87.41% vs DIA's -51.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.