PALL vs. SPPP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO).
PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010.
Performance
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 21.50% |
SPPP.TO Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust | -7.94% | 89.66% | -11.70% | -26.11% | -2.30% | -21.87% | 24.13% | 45.20% | 8.84% |
Different Trading Currencies
PALL is traded in USD, while SPPP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SPPP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP.TO's -7.94% return.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
SPPP.TO
- 1D
- 4.82%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -7.94%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 56.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- -4.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. SPPP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
SPPP.TO
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | SPPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.62 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.87 | -0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | SPPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | -0.13 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.19 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and SPPP.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor SPPP.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than SPPP.TO's maximum drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and SPPP.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | SPPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -56.80% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -36.73% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -56.80% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -30.19% | -24.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -25.96% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 12.35% | -1.04% |
Volatility
PALL vs. SPPP.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) is 15.73%, while Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP.TO) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that PALL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPPP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | SPPP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 16.98% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 42.42% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 46.11% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 33.69% | +8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 35.96% | +1.75% |