PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALD vs. SPDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALD achieves a -49.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -6.10% return.


PALD

1D
-9.16%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-49.10%
6M
-48.38%
1Y
-45.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPDN

1D
-1.47%
1M
2.21%
YTD
-6.10%
6M
-5.19%
1Y
-12.83%
3Y*
-11.29%
5Y*
-8.22%
10Y*
-12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PALD
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
-49.10%-3.89%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
-6.10%-13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PALD and SPDN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALD
PALD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PALD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PALD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDN
SPDN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDSPDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

-0.81

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.01

-1.64

-0.37

PALD vs. SPDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALD Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is comparable to the SPDN Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALD and SPDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALD drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALD and SPDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDSPDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.23%

-75.31%

+15.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.23%

-15.93%

-44.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.23%

-74.71%

+14.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-48.70%

+25.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.61%

7.99%

+14.62%

Volatility

PALD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 4.85%. This indicates that PALD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDSPDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.31%

4.85%

+13.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.90%

9.98%

+23.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.26%

12.67%

+27.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.97%

16.97%

+24.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.97%

18.01%

+22.96%

PALD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALD has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison

PALD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than SPDN's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALD
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
5.11%3.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
3.31%4.06%5.32%5.84%0.96%0.00%0.10%1.89%1.24%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALD has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to SPDN (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALD dropped -60.23% vs SPDN's -75.31%.

On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -12.83% vs -45.37% for PALD. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -12.83% return vs -45.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for PALD.

PALD has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 3.31% for SPDN.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for PALD and 0.50% for SPDN.

SPDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.02 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALD and SPDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer