PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALD vs. SPDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALD achieves a -52.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -5.99% return.


PALD

1D
2.84%
1M
-19.43%
6M
-51.24%
YTD
-52.20%
1Y
-49.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPDN

1D
0.00%
1M
1.04%
6M
-4.98%
YTD
-5.99%
1Y
-11.36%
3Y*
-10.82%
5Y*
-7.92%
10Y*
-12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PALD
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
-52.20%-3.89%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
-5.99%-13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PALD and SPDN is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALD
PALD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PALD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PALD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDN
SPDN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SPDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDN Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALDSPDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.72

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.85

-1.33

-0.52

PALD vs. SPDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALD Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the SPDN Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALD and SPDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALD drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALD and SPDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALDSPDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-75.31%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.69%

-15.93%

-47.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.65%

-74.68%

+12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.95%

-48.84%

+23.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.88%

8.53%

+18.35%

Volatility

PALD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares (PALD) has a higher volatility of 17.45% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.46%. This indicates that PALD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALDSPDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.45%

3.46%

+13.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.87%

10.14%

+25.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.45%

12.78%

+28.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.79%

16.95%

+24.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.79%

18.01%

+23.78%

PALD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALD has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison

PALD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than SPDN's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALD
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
5.45%3.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares
3.30%4.06%5.32%5.84%0.96%0.00%0.10%1.89%1.24%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALD has higher volatility (17.45%) compared to SPDN (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALD dropped -63.69% vs SPDN's -75.31%.

On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -11.36% vs -49.74% for PALD. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -11.36% return vs -49.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for PALD.

PALD has the higher dividend yield at 5.45%, compared with 3.30% for SPDN.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for PALD and 0.50% for SPDN.

SPDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALD and SPDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer